 |
|
 |
|
Prosecution / Legal Aid |
|
We have
a full fledged legal department to attend to all legal procedures
and formalities of filing suits for punishing the traffickers and
brothel keepers on behalf of the victims under Prevention of Immoral
Trafficking Act.
Besides facilitating attendance of victims in the courts and completing
all legal formalities of preparing the plaints, FIR, affidavits etc, our
legal department consisting of full time lawyer and Prevention Officers
counsel these illiterate girls and prepare them to file legal suits
against the culprits. |
 |
|
Rescue Foundation Court Case Status
|
SR No. |
Cr. No/ L.A.C No. |
Case No. |
Court Name |
Complaint Name |
Accused Name |
1 |
1809/03 on 19/03/03 |
540/P/2003 |
Mazgaon Court |
|
Radha Saiya Tamang |
2 |
325/03 on 17/10/03 |
SCC No. 113/03 |
Vashi Court |
Anjali @ Sairya Shaikh |
Arti Tamang |
3 |
3568/03 on 13/12/03 |
C.C.No.273/04 |
ADJ Pune |
|
Mubarak Nurmohmmed Shaikh, Jarina Sunil Thapa,
Chemeli Kami Tarang,
Suman Kanch Thapa,
Savita Mubarak Shaikh,
Poonam Kamal |
4 |
985.04 on 01/04/04 |
152/PW/04 |
Mazgaon court |
|
Sheela Tamang
Renu, Meera, and Annu |
5 |
1452.04 on 09/06/04 |
|
Mazgaon Court |
Kavita kanubhai Mehta(RF) |
Gauri Tamang |
6 |
1453.04 on 09/06/04 |
792/PW/05/Sess
Case no.789/2005 |
Shiwadi Court |
Harish Bhandari (RF) |
Tara KanchaTamang |
7 |
1694.04 on 09.07.04 |
407/PW/05 |
Mazgaon Court |
Balkrishna acharya |
Shanti Rambahadur Thapa, Annu Arjun Kaisi |
8 |
191.04 on 01/09/04 |
C.C.No 978/05 |
Session Court No.31 |
Balkrishna Acharya(RF) |
Rani MaylaThapa, Bimla Jambanama Nepali (Delated) |
9 |
192.04 on 01/09/04 |
C.C.No. 979/05 |
Session Court No.31 |
Kavita Kanubhai Mehta(RF) |
Seeta Raju Tamang,
Sanu (Delated)
|
10 |
365.04 on 04/12/05 |
1223/PW/2005 |
Mazgaon Court |
|
Sheela Tamang,
Kamia Thapa
Ganga Tamang |
11 |
17.05 on 12/02/05 |
R42/862/2005 |
JMFC Pune No.2 |
R.V.Kale |
Jarina Sunil Thapa,
Anita Suresh Lama,
Kajal |
12 |
151/RA/05 on 23/03/05 |
C.C.No 895/06 |
Sess Court No.30 |
Kavita Mehta (RF) |
Basanti Raju Thapa,
Seeta Raju Thapa,
Reshma Moila Tamang |
13 |
219/RA/05 on 04/05/05 |
C.C.No 354/PW/06
Sess.Case 339/06 |
Sess Court No.33 |
Shahaji Gujaba RajShirke |
Pooja Vishnath Biswas,
Kamala Sayala Thapa |
14 |
171/05 on 29/06/05 |
RCC 758/2005 |
Vashi Court |
Satish Bhagwan Jadhav |
|
15 |
190/05 on 17/07/05 |
A Final Abet |
Vashi Court |
Suryakant D.Jagdale |
|
16 |
45/05 on 31/03/05 |
R4202811/05 |
Pune Court No.2 |
|
Rupa Kancha Tamang, Seeta Sayaia Tamang, Usha MayalaTamang |
17 |
188/01 on 15/07/01 |
167/PW/05 |
Girgaon Court |
|
Sunita Thapa,
Shanti Thapa,
Abdul pathan,
Wanted Indra |
18 |
145/05 on 18/08/05 |
|
Pune Court No.2 |
Satish Narayan Jadhav |
Radha Venktesh Shetty, shiva Manbahadur Tamang |
19 |
146/05 on 18/08/05 |
|
Pune Court No.2 |
Chandrakant Ghodke |
Babita Manbahadur Tamang, Urmila arjun Thapa, Leena Raju Thapa, Maya Kansa Thapa |
20 |
147/05 on 18/08/05 |
|
Pune Court No.2 |
Suresh Janarden Ghorpade |
Babita @ Jamna Saila Lama, Rekha Raju Sheety |
21 |
459/RA/05 on 01/10/05Cr.No3373/2005 |
137/PW/2004 |
Esplanade Court |
Triveni Acharya(RF) |
Reeta Laxman Lama, Radha Shila Tamang
Mala Magar Kancha. |
22 |
LAC 76/06 07/01/06
Agripada Police Station |
17/RA/2006 |
Esplanade no.37 |
Nivruti Kolhatkar |
Divya Kanpa Kancha, Monica Rambahadur Thapa. |
23 |
57/06 on 27/03/06 |
R0401582/2006 |
Pune No.2 |
Trivani Acharya (RF) |
Rupa Kancha Tamang |
24 |
299/06 on 25/05/06 |
152/PW/2006 |
Mazgaon Court |
Triveni Acharya(RF) |
Laxanbhai Madhavrao khtri babu |
25 |
289/06 on 19/05/06 |
181/PW/2006 |
Mazgaon Court |
Farhana Nawab Khan(RF) |
Nawabkhan @ Mullam Padamshali, Laxmi @ Rukhsana, Lata Shankar Shetty, Unknown Person. |
26 |
109/06 on 03/06/06 |
|
Pune Court No.2 |
Triveni Acharya(RF) |
Kavita |
27 |
142/06 on 28/07/06 |
|
Pune Court No.2 |
Manisha Zende |
Sangeeta Kamal Tamang |
28 |
|
593/P/2003 |
Mazgaon Court |
B.M.acharya |
|
29 |
694/04 on 25/03/04 |
194/PW/2004 |
Girgaon Court |
Subhash Dudhagaonkar |
|
30 |
543/2006 on 04/02/06 |
70/RA/2006 |
Esplanade Court |
Triveni acharya(RF) |
Reeta Ramesh Tamang |
31 |
LAC 106 on 22/04/06 |
217/RA/2006 |
Esplanade Court |
Triveni acharya(RF) |
Seema & Kumar |
32 |
428/06 on 18/05/06 |
302/RA/2006 |
Esplanade Court |
Nagnath Jamadar |
Mithu Baba Badke & Neela Gauda |
33 |
394/N/2006 |
|
Esplanade Court |
|
|
34 |
154/2005 on 15/08/06 |
Miss. NO. 99/2206, 212/RA/2006 |
Girgaon Court No.4 |
Triveni Acharya(RF) |
Simladevi Shaila Tamang |
35 |
On 13/09/06 |
RA/627/06 |
Esplande Court |
Triveni Acharya(RF) |
Reeta Rameshkumar Sharma, Shankutala Devi |
36 |
3555/06 on 17/09/06 |
RA/639/2006 |
Esplande Court |
Triveni Acharya(RF) |
Nandu Dhanku Yadav |
37 |
3635/06 on 17/09/06 |
L.A.C. 3653/2006 |
Mazgaon Court |
Dyneshwer M.Gudulkar |
Jagdish Mohan Yadav |
38 |
24/06 on 27/09/06 |
L.A.C. 24/2006 |
Bhoiwada Court |
Triveni Acharya |
Radha laxman Dhankute |
39 |
206/06 on 17/11/2006 |
M.A.0403412/06 |
JMFC No.2 Pune |
Sanjeev P.Patil |
Reeta RamSingh ,
Seeta Ram shukla |
40 |
50/06 on 02/04/06 |
C.C.No.740/06 |
Session Court No.30 |
Vibhuti Joshi(RF) |
|
|
| |
Rescue
foundation’s Legal Aid Section has main aim
is that to provide legal aid to child and women who
are rescued from the brothels and to aware their legal
rights which is given by the Indian Constitution. Legal
Aid Section is working and study on the subject of Apart
from eradication prostitution, the main question
is how to control illegal confinement of minors and
major girls for the purpose of prostitution.
Rescue Foundation are working for child
and women who are grab into prostitution.
Firstly we need to understand what the exact meaning
of HUMAN TRAFFICKING is Trafficking
of human involves moving men, women and children
from one place to another and placing them in conditions
of prostitution and forced labour. The practice
includes forced sex work, domestic servitude, unsafe
agriculture labour, sweatshop labour, construction or
restaurant work, and various forms of modern-day slavery.
This global violation of human rights occurs within
countries and across borders, region, and continents.
Immoral Traffic (Amendment) Bill
New provisions in law would make sexual exploitation of trafficked persons punishable. While well-intended, the draft bill is vague; the term ‘sexual exploitation’ is not clearly defined
|
| |
HIGHLIGHTS OF THE BILL
1. The immoral Traffic (Prevention) Amendment
Bill, 2006 amends the Immoral Traffic (Prevention)
Act, 1956 to combat trafficking
and sexual exploitation for commercial purposes.
2. The Bill deletes provisions that penalized prostitutes
for soliciting clients. It penalizes any person visiting
a brothel for the purpose of
sexual exploitation of trafficked victims.
3. All offences listed in the Bill would be tried in camera, i.e. the public would be excluded from attending the trial.
4. The term “trafficking in persons” has been
defined with a provision for punishing any person who
is guilty of the offence of trafficking
in persons for the purpose of prostitution.
5. The Bill constitutes authorities at the centre and
state level to combat trafficking.
The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act
1956 makes trafficking and sexual exploitation
of persons for commercial purpose a punishable offence.
The Act was passed in line with the International Convention
for the Suppression of the Traffic in Persons
and of the Exploitation of the prostitution
of others, signed by India on May 9 1950. Although
the Act was amended twice (1978 and 1986), it did not
prove to be an effective deterrent to trafficking
or sexual exploitation for commercial purposes.
The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Amendment
Bill, 2006 aims to punish traffickers and provide
for stringent punishment.
Punishing Clients: -
The Bill seeks to penalize any person who visits a brothel
for the purpose of sexual exploitation of a trafficked
victim. The issues that arise out of such a provision
are as follows. It would be difficult for a person visiting
a brothel to distinguish between a trafficked
person and a non-trafficked person. A person
is penalized only if he sexually exploits a trafficked
victim. If the victim is not trafficked, the
client would not be penalized if the purpose of the
visit is sexual exploitation of a trafficked
victim. However, as the term ‘sexual exploitation’ is
not defined in the Bill, it could lead to harassment
of every person who visits a brothel irrespective of
the object of his visit. International experience suggests
that the provisions to penalize clients may not be an
effective way to curb sexual exploitation.
The existing legal framework of combat trafficking
includes the following. The Indian Penal Code, 1860:
Sections 363, 363A, 366A, 366B, 367, 368, 370, 371,
372, 373, and 374. These sections dale with kidnapping
(including for begging, for marriage, and for procuring
minor girl for illicit intercourse), slavery, buying
and selling minors for prostitution, and unlawful compulsory
labour. The Child Labour (Prohibition
and Regulation) Act, 1986; The Interstate Migrant Workmen
(Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service)
Act 1979; The Bonded Labour System (Abolition)
Act, 1976; The Contract Labour Regulation and
Abolition) Act, 1970.
IMPACT OF TRAFFICKING: -
Trafficked people often suffer from a multitude
of physical and psychological health problems. Women
are specifically vulnerable to reproductive and other
gender-specific health problems in trafficking
situations as they have little or no access to reproductive
health care. These problems include lack of access to
birth control, constant rapes, forced abortions and
contraceptive use, lack of regular mammograms and other
health issues. Women in domestic servitude
are subject to rape and other physical abuse, while
women in forced sex work suffer increased risk of sexually
transmitted infections, including HIV/AIDS.
WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE; -
It is crucial to adopt a rights protective approach
to counter vulnerabilities of trafficked people and
reduce stigmatization, which results in multiple burdens
for HIV-positive survivors. It is important to mainstream
trafficking and HIV/AIDS is an integrated manner
and maximize linkages and coordination between national
and regional programmes related to trafficking
of women and girls and HIV/AIDS. It
is important to adopt a multi-sectoral and participatory
approach to develop a common strategy for addressing
trafficking and HIV/AIDS issues. Key strategies
should focus on creating a new knowledge, an increased
understanding and innovative operational strategies
to create an enabling environment for social change.
Attention should be given to activities offering legal,
physical and psychological protection and empowerment
to people who are affected by trafficking and are HIV
positive. Innovative aspects include the active participation
of affected women and girls as peer workers and educations
in designing and implementing activities. Strategic
planning and networking should be supported for inter-country
bilateral and multilateral cooperation within the region.
RF Legal Aid Section had conducted a Drama of MOCK TRIAL on 9th November 2006 at office address. In this MOCK TRIAL provide a lot of information about the legal rights of victim’s girls as well as to familiar the atmosphere of court. All victim girls are very happy to see this Drama. This Drama was directed by Legal aid Section. For this MOCK TRIAL President Mrs. Triveni Acharya, Advocate Anil Pisolkar and Adv. Manoj Kumar Upadhay were present.
RF Legal Aid Section also provides the information of General Knowledge, and also prepare for trial. Every month RF Legal Aid section conducted various programme for making friendly atmosphere in Rescue Foundation Protective Home, Kandivali.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright © 2006, Rescue
Foundation.
Website By ETrends (India) |
|